a recommendation for death, the judge can't sentence the defendant. Juror Eight offers a possible scenario where the boy didnt lie: he mightve snuck into the movies to watch them (his alibi) and not been seen by the cashier. Immigrant Patriotism : Juror #11 takes a moment to gush about the jury trial system, and how it could only happen in a democracy like the United States. His guilty vote is connected to the most profound kind of emotion. But when Juror #11 berates him for this and demands he give an honest answer for switching his vote, Juror #7 says, "I don't think he's guilty in a quiet, matter-of-fact voice.
Forgiveness essay for students life
Wonder woman review essay
Dalai lama short essay
Ib extended essay requirements abstract plot
Weiler Readings on Twelve Angry Men, by Russ Munyan, Greenhaven Press, 2000, isbn Chandler, David. Juror Eight responds only that he has a doubt. A wisecracking salesman and sports fan. When he contradicts his own, earlier argument. Sidney Lumet starring, henry Fonda and a veritable, all-Star Cast of character actors) that concerns a supposedly straightforward murder trial. Juror Eleven says he never once snuck inthey didnt have movies when he was growing. An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". Dissonant Serenity : Juror #8 when Juror #3 is pretending to stab him (the other jurors are standing up, worried that #3 is actually going to stab him). The judge (in the original film) mentions that in the event the accused is found guilty, that it is automatically a death sentence (as it was until 1963 in New Yorkthe film came out in 1957 and that he would not entertain any recommendations for. They all just kind of look like they feel sorry for him. The Spock : Juror #4 is certainly the most rational of the group, concerning himself purely with the facts.