property of existing in the understanding? Hence, God is existent,.e. How much easier if we can just explicitly build all of the properties which want to derive into the initial description.) So, if Anselm really were committed to the principles which Oppenheimer and Zalta appear to attribute to him, it is hard to understand why. E., believesthat that than which no greater can be conceived possesses the property of existing in the understanding. Gaunilo raised an objection to the ontological argument on the grounds that Anselms argument can be altered to prove the existence of any concept simply by using the definition that the concept is greater than all other concepts which can be conceived. As it stands, this is deeply problematic.
And some philosophers have rejected generous conceptions of properties in favour of sparse conceptions according to which only some predicates express properties. Using a similar argument as Anselm, Gaunilo has shown that the perfect-island must exist in both the mind and in reality for the same reasons that God must exist in the mind and reality.
St anselm ontological argument essay
An existing God, therefore, would not be a being than which a greater cannot be conceived, because an even more formidable and incredible creator would be a God which did not exist. One general criticism of ontological arguments which have appeared hitherto is this: none of them is persuasive,.e., none of them provides those who do not already accept the conclusion that God existsand who are reasonable, reflective, well-informed, etc. Following the earlier line of thought, it seems that the argument might go something like this: (Even) the Fool has the concept of that than which no greater can be conceived. But Barnes 1971, for example, has Anselm committed to the much stronger claim that any existing thing is greater than every non-existent thing. To this end, Anselm moves on to give an example of how something can exist in the mind and in reality. And, on the other hand, what reason do we have to deny that, if there is one set of theologically interesting set of properties which conforms to the Gödelian specification, then there are many theologically threatening sets of properties which also conform to that specification? And then the reductio argument is produced to establish that that than which no greater can be conceived cannot exist only in the understanding but must also possess the property of existing in reality as well (and all mention of the Fool, and what. Premise 2: assuming an atheist is someone who believes that God does not exist, and the atheist is capable of thought.
The Major Features of the. Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians.